Labelling Review: Irradiated Food will remain LABELLED

The moratorium on food irradiation in Aus & NZ was lifted in 1999. Since that time, the community has been in constant campaign mode: trying (unsuccessfully) to stop a nuclear irradiation facility at Narangba/Deception Bay- then trying (also generally unsuccessfully) to stop food irradiation approvals (this is ongoing!) and more recently- trying to stop the push to remove labelling requirements.

The industry knows that people don’t really want to eat irradiated food- and sees labelling as an impediment to irradiated food’s marketability. 6 years on since the government called for a “review” of mandatory labelling, it has announced that no further action will be taken:

Irradiated Food will remain LABELLED!

The Report Summary explains that the majority of submissions were against removal of labelling:

Comments from some stakeholders, in particular consumers and consumer advocacy groups, indicated there were heightened concerns about the use of irradiation technology and a lack of understanding and acceptance of the safety and benefits of food irradiation. A common theme of consumer submissions was that the long term safety and health benefits from consuming irradiated food was unknown and there is no unequivocal evidence of its safety in relation to human health.

The majority of submitters did not support the removal of the mandatory irradiation labelling requirement. A number of these submitters were consumers, who were concerned about provision of information to enable an informed choice. Additionally, a number of submitters suggested strengthening the labelling requirement, for example prescribing the actual wording of the statement to be used or providing more information on the label about the irradiation process, its safety and the risks (if any) and benefits.

Labelling Review Recommendation 34: Review of mandatory labelling of irradiated food

This is a not only a win for the public today but will help thwart the push to remove labelling of other unpopular or unfamiliar technological manipulations of our food.

Irradiated food labelling in Aus & NZ does need to be reviewed, actually- it needs to be made more stringent and comprehensive. Labelling should require the words “irradiated” or “irradiation” or “radiation” and signs should not be allowed as a substitute for individual labels.

Food labelling should be designed to protect, inform and benefit the consuming public- not the food industry or trade agreements.

There’s work to do, and we need your help to do it, but…

For now, we (that’s all of us) have stemmed the tide!

Food and irradiation: a bad pair!

The nuclear industry: a lemon!

Click HERE for Food Standards Australia New Zealand review.

Some archival pics of protests and actions:
18195015_1998820417013082_4461170840241695544_n 18198773_1998820320346425_8892081070378647094_n 18199083_1998820317013092_7467148803944852754_n 18199167_1998820230346434_734804435841426757_n 18199224_1998820240346433_2765102700378960901_n 18221571_1998820347013089_9141729515803970859_n 18221888_1998820390346418_4069974525191615791_n 18221909_1998820237013100_3747786758810603499_n 18222350_1998820243679766_2566537859250685174_n 18222615_1998820283679762_4840343837050693639_n 18268621_1998820443679746_27095569790390878_n 18275229_1998820397013084_5750038230808732071_n

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *